DIGITAL LEADERSHIP AND CYBERSECURITY GOVERNANCE IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS

Authors

  • Amna Saeed (Corresponding Author) Assistant Professor, Department of Early childhood Education, Institute of Education and Research, University of the Punjab Author
  • Dr. Tanveer Iqbal Associate Professor Department of Education, The University of Lahore, Lahore Pakistan Author
  • Dr. Sadia Jabeen Lecturer, Department of Education, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan. Author
  • Syed Zaheer Abbas PhD Scholar Department of Education, The University of Lahore, Lahore Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63878/qrjs1086

Keywords:

digital leadership; cybersecurity governance; secondary schools; public schools; private schools; school principals; distributed leadership; information security; digital safety.

Abstract

This study explored how digital leadership affects cybersecurity governance in public and private secondary schools in the punjab. The researchers also examined whether school type, gender, and administrative experience influenced this relationship. A total of 120 school leaders and teachers participated in the study using surveys on digital leadership and cybersecurity governance. The findings showed a strong positive relationship between digital leadership and cybersecurity governance. This means that schools with better digital leadership also had stronger cybersecurity practices. Digital leadership explained 47% of the improvement in cybersecurity governance. The study also found that private schools had better cybersecurity governance than public schools. In addition, school type, gender, and administrative experience had significant effects on the relationship between digital leadership and cybersecurity governance. Overall, the study highlights that strong digital leadership is important for improving cybersecurity, developing effective policies, and creating a safer digital environment in schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, J. M. (2003). Why we need a new definition of information security. Computers & Security, 22(4), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4048(03)00407-3

Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Baker, B. (2014). E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.003

Bada, M., Sasse, A. M., & Nurse, J. R. C. (2019). Cyber security awareness campaigns: Why do they fail to change behaviour? arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.02672. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.02672

Bulgurcu, B., Cavusoglu, H., & Benbasat, I. (2010). Information security policy compliance: An empirical study of rationality-based beliefs and information security awareness. MIS Quarterly, 34(3), 523–548. https://doi.org/10.2307/25750690

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Elçi, A., & Devran, B. H. (2018). Cyber security culture in organization. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change, 9(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJISSC.2018070102

Hallinger, P. (2020). Science mapping the knowledge base on educational leadership and management from the emerging regions of Asia, Africa and Latin America, 1965–2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218822772

Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2020). COVID 19 – school leadership in disruptive times. School Leadership & Management, 40(4), 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1811479

NIST. (2018). Framework for improving critical infrastructure cybersecurity (Version 1.1). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.CSWP.04162018

Noori, A. Q. (2023). Job satisfaction variance among public and private school teachers: A case study. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2189425

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Polat, M., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2021). The relationship between school principals' digital leadership behaviors and teachers' motivation. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 6(14), 289–314. https://doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.196

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers' adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009

Shabbir, M., & Wei, S. (2015). Job satisfaction variance among public and private school teachers, case of Pakistan Administrative Kashmir. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s1p574

Sheninger, E. (2014). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times. Corwin Press.

Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984692

Von Solms, R., & Van Niekerk, J. (2013). From information security to cyber security. Computers & Security, 38, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2013.04.004

Zhang, J. (2023). Exploring the impact of transformational school leadership on teacher job satisfaction. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 8(1), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v8i1.6875

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25

How to Cite

DIGITAL LEADERSHIP AND CYBERSECURITY GOVERNANCE IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS. (2026). Qualitative Research Journal for Social Studies, 3(2), 254-266. https://doi.org/10.63878/qrjs1086