شاہ ولی اللہ محدث دہلویؒ کے فلسفۂ اتفاقات کی عصری و سیاسی معنویت

Shah Wali Allah Muhaddith Dehlawi's Philosophy of Ittifaqat (Harmony): A Critical and Analytical Study of Its Contemporary Political Relevance

Authors

  • Fawad Saeed Lecturer Islamic Studies, Szabist University Karachi campus. Author
  • Faheem ur Razzaq M.Phil. Research Scholar, Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences & Humanities, Hamdard University Karachi. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63878/qrjs1266

Keywords:

Shah Wali Allah Dehlawi,Philosophy of Ittifaqat,Contemporary Politics, Islamic Political Thought, Governance, Social Harmony, Maṣlaḥah, Shura.

Abstract

This research article examines the contemporary and political significance of the philosophy of Ittifaqat developed by Shah Wali Allah Muhaddith Dehlawi.It explores the conceptual foundations of this philosophy and highlights its role in promoting social harmony, political stability, justice, and collective welfare within an Islamic framework. Using an analytical and qualitative research methodology, the study investigates Shah Wali Allah’s views in light of his primary works and relevant contemporary scholarship.The article argues that his philosophy offers practical guidance for addressing modern political polarization, governance challenges, and social conflicts. It further demonstrates that the principles of moderation, consultation,public interest,and unity emphasized by Shah Wali Allah remain highly relevant for contemporary Muslim societies. The study concludes that his political thought provides a balanced intellectual framework capable of contributing to ethical governance and sustainable social cohesion in the modern world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-24

How to Cite

شاہ ولی اللہ محدث دہلویؒ کے فلسفۂ اتفاقات کی عصری و سیاسی معنویت: Shah Wali Allah Muhaddith Dehlawi’s Philosophy of Ittifaqat (Harmony): A Critical and Analytical Study of Its Contemporary Political Relevance. (2026). Qualitative Research Journal for Social Studies, 3(1), 232-248. https://doi.org/10.63878/qrjs1266