سیرتِ نبویﷺ میں صنفی توازن کا تصور: نسوانی حقوق کی شرعی تعبیر اور جدید مباحث کا تجزیاتی مطالعہ

The Concept of Gender Balance in the Seerah of the Prophet (PBUH): A Shariah Perspective on Women's Rights and an Analytical Study of Modern Debates

Authors

  • Dr. Atiq ur Rahman Associate Professor, Department of Islamic Studies, University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Lahore, Pakistan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63878/qrjs603

Keywords:

- Gender balance, Seerah of the Prophet (PBUH), Women's rights, Shariah perspective, Modern debates, Women's empowerment, Equality and justice.

Abstract

This research paper explores the concept of gender balance in the Seerah (life and teachings) of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), focusing on the Shariah perspective on women's rights and its relevance to modern debates. The study aims to analyze the Prophet's approach to women's empowerment, equality, and justice, and to highlight the significance of gender balance in Islamic teachings. The paper examines the Prophet's interactions with women, including his wives, daughters, and female companions, and highlights his role in promoting women's rights and challenging patriarchal norms. It also discusses the Quranic verses and Hadiths that emphasize the importance of justice, equality, and mutual respect between men and women. The study concludes that the Seerah of the Prophet (PBUH) provides a comprehensive framework for achieving gender balance and promoting women's rights, which is essential for building a just and equitable society. The paper also highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of Islamic teachings and their application to modern debates on women's rights and empowerment.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-30

How to Cite

سیرتِ نبویﷺ میں صنفی توازن کا تصور: نسوانی حقوق کی شرعی تعبیر اور جدید مباحث کا تجزیاتی مطالعہ: The Concept of Gender Balance in the Seerah of the Prophet (PBUH): A Shariah Perspective on Women’s Rights and an Analytical Study of Modern Debates. (2025). Qualitative Research Journal for Social Studies, 2(1), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.63878/qrjs603