MECHANISMS OF EXCLUSION: POWER, STRUCTURE, AND THE PERSISTENCE OF GENDER INEQUALITY

Authors

  • Dr. Muhammad Rafiq-uz-Zaman 1Doctor of Philosophy in Education, Department of Education, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan Author https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4853-045X
  • Dr. Muhammad Asif (Corresponding Author) Assistant Professor, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science & Technology, Islamabad Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63878/qrjs921

Keywords:

Organizational Power Structures, Gender Inequality, Formal Hierarchy, Informal Networks, Decision-Making Control, Organizational Culture.

Abstract

The present research explores how organisational power systems increase gender inequality. Based on the feminist organisational theory and institutional viewpoints, it examines the role of formal hierarchies, informal networks, decision-making control, and organisational culture in generating gendered results in institutions. A structured survey was conducted on 417 employees at different levels of the hierarchy to obtain the data. Structural equation modelling revealed that the dimensions of organisational power are all significant and positive determinants of gender inequality, although decision-making control produces the strongest effect. Multi-group analyses showed that these effects were more prominent in female respondents. The results shed more light on structural and cultural processes that perpetuate gender inequalities and highlight the need to intervene both organizationally and policy-wise to address both formal and informal power relations. This work will contribute to theory and provide practical recommendations on how to promote gender equity in organisations by combining structural, relational, and cultural approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002

Asif, M. (2024). The complexities of bioterrorism: Challenges and considerations. International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Social Sciences, 3(3), 2175–2184.

Asif, M., Ali, A., & Shaheen, F. A. (2025). Assessing the Effects of Artificial Intelligence in Revolutionizing Human Resource Management: A Systematic Review. Social Science Review Archives, 3(4), 2887–2908. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i3.1055

Asif, M., & Asghar, R. J. (2025). Managerial accounting as a driver of financial performance and sustainability in small and medium enterprises in Pakistan. Center for Management Science Research, 3(7), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17596478

Aurangzeb, Mushtaque, T., Tunio, M. N., Zia-ur-Rehman, & Asif, M. (2021). Influence of administrative expertise of human resource practitioners on the job performance: Mediating role of achievement motivation. International Journal of Management, 12(4), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.12.4.2021.035

Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination. Stanford University Press.

Coffman, K. (2025, March 27). Harvard research reveals hidden forces that limit women's and minorities' advancement. Harvard Business School. Retrieved from https://www.hbs.edu/news/articles/Pages/limit-womens-advancement.aspx

Connell, R. (2006). Glass ceilings or gendered institutions? Mapping the gender regimes of public sector worksites. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 837–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00652.x

Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573

French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). University of Michigan.

Gallup. (2025). State of the Global Workplace: 2025 report. Gallup, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349424/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx

Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422–447. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393451

Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.

Kim, S., Phillips, L. T., & Glick, P. (2025). Organizational intolerance of sexual harassment eliminates gender differences in empathy and intervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 128(3), 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000456

McKinsey & Company and LeanIn.Org. (2025). Women in the Workplace 2025. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace

People Element. (2025). 2025 Employee Engagement Report. Retrieved from https://peopleelement.com/insights/employee-engagement-report/

Philbin, M. M., Parker, C. M., & Parker, R. G. (2023). Gender(ed) science: The paradox of success and progress. American Journal of Public Health, 113(1), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307120

Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Free Press.

World Economic Forum. (2025). Global Gender Gap Report 2025. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2025.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

MECHANISMS OF EXCLUSION: POWER, STRUCTURE, AND THE PERSISTENCE OF GENDER INEQUALITY. (2026). Qualitative Research Journal for Social Studies, 3(1), 690-703. https://doi.org/10.63878/qrjs921